Ind AS 37, Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets : The objective of Ind AS 37 is to ensure that appropriate recognition criteria and measurement bases are applied to provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets and that sufficient information is disclosed in the notes to enable users to understand their nature, timing and amount.
Ind AS 37 prescribes the accounting and disclosures for provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets, except:
- those resulting from executory contracts, except where the contract is onerous; and
- those covered by another
Ind AS 37 also do not apply to financial instruments (including guarantees) that are within the scope of Ind AS 109, Financial Instruments.
Some amounts treated as provisions may relate to the recognition of revenue, for example, where an entity gives guarantees in exchange for fee. Ind AS 37 does not address the recognition of revenue. Ind AS 18, Revenue, identifies the circumstances in which revenue is recognised and provides practical guidance on the application of the recognition criteria. Ind AS 37 does not change the requirements of Ind AS 18.
A provision is a liability of uncertain timing and amount. A provision shall be recognised when:
- an entity has a present obligation (legal or constructive) that is a result of a past event;
- it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation; and
- a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. If these conditions are not met, no provision shall be recognised
Provisions shall be reviewed at the end of each reporting period and adjusted to reflect the current best estimate. If it is no longer probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation, the provision shall be reversed.
In rare cases, it is not clear whether there is a present obligation. In these cases, a past event is deemed to give rise to a present obligation if, taking account of all available evidence, it is more likely than not that a present obligation exists at the end of the reporting period.
The amount recognised as a provision shall be the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present obligation at the end of the reporting period. The best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present obligation is the amount that an entity would rationally pay to settle the obligation at the end of the reporting period or to transfer it to a third party at that time.
Where the provision being measured involves a large population of items, the obligation is estimated by weighting all possible outcomes by their associated probabilities. Where a single obligation is being measured, the individual most likely outcome may be the best estimate of the liability. However, even in such a case, the entity considers other possible outcomes.
Risks and uncertainties
The risks and uncertainties that inevitably surround many events and circumstances shall be taken into account in reaching the best estimate of a provision.
Where the effect of the time value of money is material, the amount of a provision shall be the present value of the expenditures expected t o be required to settle the obligation.
Future events that may affect the amount required to settle an obligation shall be reflected in the amount of a provision where there is sufficient objective evidence that they will occur.
Expected disposals of assets
Gains from the expected disposals of assets shall not be taken into account in measuring a provision. These are not recognised even if the expected disposal is closely linked to the event giving rise to the provision.
When some or all of the expenditure required to settle a provision is expected to be reimbursed by another party, the reimbursement shall be recognised when, and only when, it is virtually certain that reimbursement will be received if the entity settles the obligation. The reimbursement shall be treated as a separate asset. The amount recognised for the reimbursement shall not exceed the amount of the provision. In the statement of profit and loss, the expense relating to a provision may be presented net of the amount recognised for a reimbursement.
If an entity has a contract that is onerous, the present obligation under the contract shall be recognised and measured as a provision. This Standard defines an onerous contract as a contract in which the unavoidable costs of meeting the obligations under the contract exceed the economic benefits expected to be received under it. The unavoidable costs under a contract reflect the least net cost of exiting from the contract, which is the lower of the cost of fulfilling it and any compensation or penalties arising from failure to fulfill it.
A provision for restructuring costs is recognised only when the general recognition criteria for provisions are met.
With respect to restructuring obligation, the Standard provides guidance for application of general recognition conditions that need to be complied with for recognition of restructuring provision and identification of expenses that are in the nature of restructuring cost.
Appendix A of Ind AS 37 provides guidance on (a) how a contributor account for its interest in a fund and (b) when a contributor has an obligation to make additional contributions, for example, in the event of the bankruptcy of another contributor or if the value of the investment assets held by the fund decreases to an extent that they are insufficient to fulfil the fund’s reimbursement obligations, how that obligation be accounted for. The Appendix prescribes that the contributor shall recognise its obligati on to pay decommissioning costs as a liability and recognise its interest in the fund separately unless the contributor is not liable to pay decommissioning costs even if the fund fails to pay. When a contributor has an obligation to make potential additional contributions, this obligation is a contingent liability that is within the scope of Ind AS 37. The contributor shall recognise a liability only if it is probable that additional contributions will be made.
Appendix B of Ind AS 37 provides guidance on the recognition, in the financial statements of producers, of liabilities for waste management under the European Union’s Directive on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WE&EE), in respect of sales of historical household equipment. This Appendix addresses neither new waste nor historical waste from sources other than private households. The liability for such waste management is adequately covered in Ind AS 37. However, if, in national legislation, new waste from private households is treated in a similar manner to historical waste from private households, the principles of this Appendix apply by reference to the hierarchy in paragraphs 10-12 of Ind AS 8. The Ind AS 8 hierarchy is also relevant for other regulations that impose obligations in a way that is similar to the cost attribution model specified in the EU Directive.
Appendix C to Ind AS 16 addresses the accounting for a liability to pay a levy if that liability is within the scope of Ind AS 37. It also addresses the accounting for a liability to pay a levy whose timing and amount is certain. The Appendix prescribes that obligating event that gives rise to a liability to pay a levy is the activity that triggers the payment of the levy, as identified by the legislation. An entity does not have a constructive obligation to pay a levy that will be triggered by operating in a future period as a result of the entity being economically compelled to continue to operate in that future period. The liability to pay a levy is recognised progressively if the obligating event occurs over a period of time
Difference Between AS 29 and Ind AS 37
AS 29 vs Ind AS 37
|AS 29||Ind AS 37|
|AS 29 prohibits discounting of provisions except in case of decommissioning, restoration and other similar liabilities, that are considered as a part of cost of PPE.||Ind AS 37 requires discounting the amounts of provision, if the effect of time value of money is material.|
|AS 29 requires the disclosure of contingent assets in the report of approving authority but prohibits the disclosure of the same in financial statements.||Ind AS 37 requires the disclosure of contingent assets in financial statements.|
|AS 29 requires creation of provision as a result of:
||Ind AS 37 requires creation of provision in respect of constructive obligation.
Consequently, the terms “legal obligation” and “constructive obligation” have been inserted and defined in Ind AS 37.
|There is no such provision in the AS 29.||Ind AS 37 specifically states that before a separate provision is created for “onerous contract”, an impairment loss, if any, on the assets dedicated or allocated for such contract must be recognized.|
|AS 29 is silent on these issues.||Ind AS 37 provides guidance on:
|AS 29 states that no provision is to be made for identifiable future operating losses up to the date of restructuring.||Ind AS 37 states that no provision is to be made for identifiable future operating losses up to the date of restructuring, except losses related to onerous contract.|
- Types of Vouchers
- Types of Lease
- Scope of Accounting
- Basic Principles of Accounting
- CA Final Admit Card
- CA Final RTP
- Pan Card Status
- CA IPCC RTP
- CA Final Question Papers
- Income Tax Slab Rates
- Sub Fields of Accounting